Conclusion

ADVERTISEMENT



Well, as I’m sure most of you were expecting to see, Arctic Silver 5 came out on top, by a few degrees. If you have some Ceramique lying around and aren’t Overclocking every last ounce of juice out of your CPU, then I personally wouldn’t worry about rushing out and buying Arctic Silver 5. However, if you’re on the race to hold the top 3DMark score, or have as many frames as you can in your new first person shooter, and need to overclock as much as you can, then Arctic Silver 5 is for you.

However, both products from Arctic Silver reviewed here have high curing times. Curing is the process of the thermal paste, settling in, so to speak. After so many hours the paste will achieve its best performance, and when using either product I waited a solid week before taking the temperatures. It’s worth the wait!





 PROS  CONS

OCZ Ultra II: A large tube for the price. Best for OEM system builders that want to offer that little extra without paying a lot.

Arctic Silver Ceramique: Unique application instructions. Easy to work with.

Arctic Silver 5: Easy to work with. Provides the best results.

Nanotherm PCM+: Liquid form makes this the easiest to put on a CPU.







OCZ Ultra II: Hard to work with. Mediocre results.

Arctic Silver Ceramique: Unique application instructions. Curing time required for best results.

Arctic Silver 5: Very long curing time required to achieve the best results.

Nanotherm PCM+: Corrosion?






   
Have a question for the author? Want to make a comment? Then head to our forums!
 
 
 
CONTENTS
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Packaging
Page 3: Install
Page 4: Testing & Results
Page 5: Conclusion
 


GruntvillE.com is © Copyright 2002 - 2005 GruntvillE.com. All Rights Reserved.